|
Gordon Grigg, co-author of the kangaroo industry’s slaughter
bible (Commercial Harvesting of Kangaroos in Australia), has
delivered a devastating blow to the policy of kangaroo slaughter
by declaring there are serious doubts “that major benefits
flow to wool producers from reducing kangaroo numbers”.
He goes on to add: “... the hope of getting a significant
improvement in wool production by pest control of kangaroos
is probably doomed to failure”.
Grigg’s landmark speech - which can be seen as a reversal
of his previously held position - was made directly to the killing
industry when he addressed the Wildlife Management Society’s
14th Scientific Meeting from December 3-5, hosted at Dubbo,
NSW, by the NSW National Parks and Wildlife Service.
His views challenge long-held industry beliefs that a single
kangaroo’s forage demands are almost equivalent to those
of a single sheep (0.7). Grigg has reviewed his position on
the basis of “two quite independent and long published
studies which .... challenge such assumptions very strongly”.
In fact the studies show that the demands of one kangaroo are
equivalent to between just 0.15 - 0.2 of a sheep’s. In
practical terms this means that the damage on grazing lands
attributed to kangaroos has been overestimated by as much as
470 per cent. Stating the obvious, Grigg concludes: “This
would mean that kangaroos are a much smaller component of the
‘total grazing pressure’ than is generally accepted.”
Speaking from Sydney, Juliet Gellatley, Director of the UK campaign
group Viva!, responded by saying: “This is the final straw
which exposes the current commercial slaughter as a cruel, unnecessary,
unscientific and devastating blow to Australia’s unique
wildlife - exactly as we have always maintained. Like Nero,
who refused to face the obvious, the killing industry is continuing
to fiddle the truth. This research comes on top of other findings
published as recently as July, 2001, by scientists at the University
of NSW. They established that kangaroos are not at epidemic
proportions, that farm waterholes play no part in increasing
kangaroo numbers and that few joeys survive to adulthood. Most
depressing of all, they also established that red kangaroos
are being destroyed at least three times as fast as they can
reproduce. It came on top of other research showing that there
is no negative impact of red kangaroos on sheep.
“The killing industry has been protected as if it were
as national saviour, supported by a series of myths which no
one ever bothers to investigate. The final piece of the jigsaw
has now been fitted into place and exposes their claims for
what they are - blatant untruths. I challenge the kangaroo slaughter
industry to a national debate - one based on reputable science
rather than the feeble and greedy excuses of a cruel and profit-driven
industry. Wake up Australia, while there’s still time
to save your wonderful wildlife.” |